Dhurandhar 2: Why International Critics Are Calling It “Too Violent”
- Elizabeth Sanate
- 1 hour ago
- 4 min read
There’s a point where action stops feeling exciting and starts feeling uncomfortable.
Dhurandhar 2 has people arguing over whether it crosses that line or completely ignores it.
Some international critics are calling it “too violent,” even questioning why audiences are showing up for something this intense. And yet, the theatres aren’t empty.
If anything, the reaction seems to be pulling in the opposite direction.
So what exactly is making some viewers push back while others lean in?
Is Dhurandhar 2 really “too violent”?
Yes, at least by international criticism standards. But that answer isn’t complete on its own. Because Dhurandhar 2 isn’t just violent in the usual action-movie way. It’s designed to feel overwhelming. The kind of film where the intensity doesn’t come in waves, it just keeps building. That’s where the divide starts. For some viewers, that’s the appeal. For others, that’s exactly the problem.
What exactly is making critics uncomfortable?
This isn’t about one or two shocking scenes.
It’s the consistency of it.
Reports across outlets like The Indian Express and WION show that international reactions haven’t just described the film as violent, they've called it difficult to process, with some even questioning its appeal altogether. One widely cited reaction described it as “hard to fathom why audiences are flocking to see all this.”
And when you look at what’s actually on screen, the reaction starts to make more sense.
The film doesn’t hold back on brutality. There are moments involving beheadings, skull-crushing impacts, and close-up violence that linger longer than most mainstream films would allow. And it’s not presented as an isolated shock. It becomes part of the film’s rhythm.
That’s the key issue critics are pointing out, not just how violent it is, but how relentless it feels. There’s very little pause. Very little distance. Just impact, again and again.
Even after cuts, it still feels like too much
What makes this even more surprising is that the version audiences are watching isn’t even the most extreme one.
The film went through censorship cuts, trimming down some of its more graphic sequences. And according to statements from the action team, only around 60% of the originally planned brutality actually made it into the final cut.
Which raises a strange thought: If this is the reduced version, what did the original look like?
And more importantly, if even the toned-down version feels overwhelming to critics, then the issue clearly isn’t just about a few scenes. It’s about the film’s overall approach.
Why the violence feels different here?
This is where the conversation shifts from what is happening to how it’s being used. In many international films, violence is often tied to consequences. It’s meant to disturb, to question, to slow you down.
In Dhurandhar 2, it works differently. Here, violence is tied to power, revenge, and emotional payoff. And in some readings, even to ideas of identity and nationalism, something that outlets like The Hindu have pointed out as part of the discomfort around the film.
So instead of asking, “Should this be happening?”
The film often asks, “Does this feel satisfying?”
That shift is exactly why the same scene can feel powerful to one viewer and uncomfortable to another.
So why are audiences still showing up?
This is the part critics don’t fully answer, but audiences already have. Because for many viewers, that level of aggression isn’t a drawback. It’s the point.
The film gives audiences something very clear to hold on to, a side to root for, a reason to stay invested, and a constant sense that things are only going to escalate from here. And in that space, the violence doesn’t feel excessive. It feels earned. Or at least, it feels aligned with what the film is trying to do.
That’s why the same scenes that push some viewers away pull others in.
Maybe it’s not about “too violent” after all.
At some point, the question stops being: Is Dhurandhar 2 too violent?
And becomes: Too violent for whom?
Because the reaction isn’t universal. It depends on what you expect from a film like this. If you’re looking for restraint, reflection, or moral distance, this won’t feel comfortable.
But if you’re watching it as a full-scale, no-holding-back experience, then that intensity might be exactly why it works.
The real reason this debate isn’t going away
So maybe the conversation around Dhurandhar 2 was never going to settle easily.
Because this is about how far that experience stretches for different people, not just about what the film shows. At what point does intensity stop feeling engaging and start feeling overwhelming?
And more importantly, does that line stay the same for everyone watching?
Right now, it clearly doesn’t. And that’s exactly why the debate around Dhurandhar 2 isn’t fading anytime soon.
Follow The ScreenLight for more stories that go beyond what’s on screen.
